Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJacob, Gabriel Henry
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Xingye
dc.contributor.authorGielnik, Michael Marcus
dc.contributor.authorKaur, Ameek
dc.contributor.authorAntonio, Tony
dc.contributor.authorMurwani, Fulgentius Danardana
dc.contributor.authorHendrasmoro
dc.contributor.authorHasan, Johan
dc.contributor.authorWaney, Gamaliel
dc.contributor.authorChristiani, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorLam, Swee-Sum
dc.contributor.authorSeah, David Jeremiah
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-18T03:37:47Z
dc.date.available2021-11-18T03:37:47Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2151-6561
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.uc.ac.id/handle/123456789/3848
dc.description.abstractAmbidexterity theory proposes that systems pursuing innovation at the individual, team or, organization level must be capable of performing both exploratory and exploitative activities to successfully deal with the conflicting demands of innovation. Empirical support has been found for this theory at the individual level, but not at the team level. To address this gap, we conceptualized ambidexterity at the team level, and investigated its antecedent, as well as whether and when it leads to innovation success. Results using 395 members from 89 business venture teams developing innovative product or service indicated a team’s aggregated personal initiative is positively related to team ambidexterity. Further, error management climate moderated the relationship between team ambidexterity and innovation success: this relationship was only positive when error management climate was high.en_US
dc.publisherAcademy of Management Proceedingsen_US
dc.titleTeam Ambidexterity: Investigating Its Antecedent And Consequence Of Innovation Successen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record